Comments on 'Terrorism: Ron Paul vs. Giuliani @ SC Debate'
BackNext
terrywatt69 (November 21st, 2008 @ 1:45 am)
One-note Rudy did what was expected of him on September 11, 2001. He didn't turn tail and run, and provided leadership on the ground in Mew York City. As well he should have; he was the mayor, after all. What he did on that day, however, clearly didn't provide him with any meaningful understanding of WHY we were attacked and how we should have reacted on the global stage afterwards. Thank God, Allah, Buddah and Jesus that Rudy wasn't elected President. He was an asshole before and after 9/11.
MordechayAriely (November 20th, 2008 @ 1:54 pm)
Values are the basic of anti USA terrirism
Read Sheik Abu Baber book
Governance in the wilderness claimimg:
THE WEST HAS NO STOMACH FOR A LONG FIGHT
THE ONLY WESTREN POWER STILL CAPABLE TO RESIST ISLAM IS THE USA
Values
Mankind Pluralism-USA
Mankind Monolith-ME
Human rights-USA
Theocracy&Dictatorship ruler's rights-ME
Democracy-USA
Dictatorship-ME
Impose religion on others fby force-ME
Stanhan12 (November 18th, 2008 @ 11:16 pm)
Should terrorists have the same rights in US courts as "normal" criminals?
Ive found this question on pollunity.
And in my opinion you should answer this question with YES but there are lots of people with other views!!
bmdude7 (November 18th, 2008 @ 7:43 pm)
Ron Paul is the only Republican who hasn't completely lost his mind.
You heard how much the crowd (presumably Republican) loved Giuliani's response. Republicans love the idea that Muslims are evil incarnate and that they only attack us because we are free and predominately Christian. Unfortunately that idea is not based in reality at all. Brazil is free and Christian, and would make an easier target than us. Why didn't they attack Brazil?
jaredhutcheson (November 18th, 2008 @ 12:54 am)
Giuliani is a flag-waving idiot.
HrvRoy (November 17th, 2008 @ 1:01 am)
If only they got Giuliani in 2001!
t66wood (November 17th, 2008 @ 12:01 am)
Ron Paul's opinion is supported by facts he presented, Rudy presented no facts to the contary, making it a one sided debate in the favor of truth, in the favor of Dr. Ron Paul. Also, this footage could have easily edited to cater the crowd to Rudy's favor, as Big Brother (Faux News) would want. Ron Paul and the few like him speak the truth, and until the people wake up and realize that Fox "News" is bias and turn to other new organizations, the people will always be blinded by bias. Ron Paul!!
coffeeintheface (November 13th, 2008 @ 2:01 am)
Paul completely owned Giuliani and all those idiots by explaining how our overthrow of Mossadeq and installment of the Shah of Iran in 1953 LED to their hatred towards us today. These people either don't know history or choose to ignore it. All the countries that hate us today, and Al Qaeda that attacked us on 9/11, did so as a reaction to either State occupation, violence, or both. As with every problem, big gov is to blame and then citizens are EXPECTED to believe in the cause.
VF5 (November 12th, 2008 @ 6:57 am)
I support Obama, but I agree with you. I wouldn't feel bad if Paul does win. He has my respect; the only republican who speak the truth and don't give a shit about the status quo.
ceviche666 (November 12th, 2008 @ 5:46 am)
Now that's the real STRAIGHT TALK express.Unfortunately as much as I admire this man he is non-electable. He's not a sellout and doesn't cater or cowtow to his party or voters. Such is the game of politics in this country...
medicineman4ever (November 10th, 2008 @ 8:04 am)
Indeed.
trinsit (November 10th, 2008 @ 6:31 am)
With the education system as it is, is it really surprising? Now a days, a person has to go seek their own education to truly know something, instead of the adults passing it down to the youth, as it should be.
Next